00 / Semarang Smart City · 2026–2035

The land sinks.
The tide rises.
Ten years to act.

Semarang is not a greenfield. It already runs BRT, ATCS, flood sensors, and a decade of digital services — fragmented across fifty apps while the coast subsides. This master plan integrates what exists, puts resilience first, and treats operations as the product.

Rp 3.1T10-yr envelope
4phases
3hard gates
6domains
25%PT mode share '35
99%pump uptime
01 / The problem

Not a greenfield.

The systems exist. What's missing is integration, operations, and the right priority order. Phase 0 money goes into plumbing — not new apps.

Domain
What exists today
The gap
Governance
Satu Data portal, 50+ OPD apps
No shared platform; silos, no single citizen account
Mobility
Trans Semarang BRT, ATCS, CCTV
No integrated ticketing; signals fixed-time, no demand loop
Environment
Pantau Banjir, pumps, Jatibarang gas
Sparse sensing; subsidence not monitored in real time
Services
Si D'nok, Ambulan Hebat, OSS
Channel sprawl; complaints not closed-loop
Assets
SIMBADA-type records
Paper-era registry; reactive maintenance only
02 / Strategy

Three theses before procurement.

Most Indonesian smart-city programs fail at procurement and operations, not technology. These rules are the difference between a platform and a graveyard of dashboards.

01

Resilience first.

Subsidence and tidal flooding are existential. Hydromet sensing, pump SCADA, and InSAR monitoring are Tier-1 — chatbots are not.

02

Integrate before innovate.

Fifty apps already exist as islands. One data platform, one identity, mandatory APIs — before any new point solution is bought.

03

Operations over launches.

Every capex item carries a funded 5-year O&M plan, city-owned data and code, and an exit clause. No lock-in, no dead dashboards.

03 / The map

Six domains. One platform.

Every domain rides the same plumbing. The program map below is the whole plan on one screen — explore each domain in detail on the next page.

Plate 04 — Program Mapsix domains · one platform
Program map: six domains over one shared data platform
01 / The clock

Ten years. Four phases. Three gates.

The plan is gated, not continuous. Each phase ends at a go/no-go checkpoint, and Gate 1 is timed before the 2030 mayoral transition on purpose — political risk is the single biggest threat to a decade-long program.

Phase explorer

Click a phase.

Each phase carries its own deliverables and exit condition. Phase 0 has a kill switch; the others have outcome targets.

Plate 01 — Timeline

The whole decade, at a glance.

Phase bands, the three gates, and the mayoral transition on a single axis.

Plate 01 — Phased Roadmap2026 → 2035
Phased roadmap Gantt with three gates and mayoral transition marker
02 / The work

Six domains.
One platform.

Public transport, traffic, waste, flood & environment, public services, and asset management — each riding the same shared data platform, identity, and sensing network underneath.

Domain explorer

Pick a domain.

Each domain leads with a measurable goal, then the programs that deliver it, then the KPIs it reports.

Shared foundation

The plumbing under all of it.

▢ Semarang City Data Platform ▢ Akun Warga identity (SSO) ▢ City IoT — LoRaWAN ▢ GIS / Digital Twin ▢ CSIRT security
Plate 04 — Program Mapdomains × platform
Program map showing six domains over one shared platform
03 / Delivery

Funded. Measured. De-risked.

A plan is only as good as its money, its metrics, and its honesty about what could break it. Here are all three.

Financing

Rp 3.1 T — not APBD-only.

About Rp 280–350 B per year, roughly 4–5% of the city's APBD. Self-financing programs — streetlight ESCO, smart parking, property-tax intelligence — are front-loaded so the program pays for its own later phases.

Sources of funds

APBD Kota 58% APBN / Kementerian 18% KPBU / ESCO 12% Donor / MDB 7% Self-generated 5%
Hard rules: 5-year TCO approved up front · O&M ≈ 20% of capex/yr · city owns data + code escrow · ≥70% of spend on the six domains, ≤30% on experiments.

Spend by phase (Rp billion)

Phase 0 · Foundation250
Phase 1 · Integrate & Instrument950
Phase 2 · Optimize & Scale1,100
Phase 3 · Lead & Sustain800
Largest allocations: mobility (Rp 1.10 T) and flood + waste resilience (Rp 0.78 T).
Plate 02 — Financing Strategysources · spend by domain
Financing strategy: source mix donut and spend-by-domain bars
Accountability

Targets, published quarterly.

Baseline → 2035. Teal targets rise; terracotta targets fall. The public scorecard is the enforcement mechanism — not goodwill.

Plate 03 — Headline Targetsbaseline → 2035
Headline KPI targets, baseline to 2035 dumbbell chart
Risk register

What kills plans like this.

Named openly, because the mitigations are structural — not hopeful.

High2030 mayoral transition

Embed in Perda + RPJMD; Gate 1 timed before the election; visible citizen wins early.

HighOPD data-sharing resistance

Perda mandate, Sekda-level escalation, OPD KPIs tied to performance pay.

HighVendor lock-in / dead dashboards

City owns code + data; 20% O&M budgeted; exit plan in every contract.

Med–HighSensor network decay

Cheap replaceable LoRaWAN units; local SME maintenance; EAM asset tags.

MediumCitizen data breach (UU PDP)

DPO + privacy impact assessments, ISO 27001, pen-testing, CSIRT.

MediumSubsidence outpaces adaptation

Sensing tied to binding groundwater & building permits — dashboards alone change nothing.